

TLDR: Crypto as an industry holds tremendous potential to redefine how money is used globally, but the requirement of manual transactions in a fragmented ecosystem has resulted in growing inefficiencies with no effective solution today. The introduction of automated strategies accessible in a single click enables users to realize many of the initial dreams of crypto that countless were sold on.

Crypto has the potential to change the way people use money forever.

The ideal world of crypto still feels like a dream. A world where you have real ownership of your money. Where you aren’t resorting to a bank with a 2/3 multi-sig between you, the bank, and government. Where you can spend your money how you please without concern of geographical restrictions or rules. Where you can escape local inflation and find safety in an asset that has more sound fiscal policy without a money printer that constantly dilutes your buying power.

You can boil everything down to: crypto is programmable money that lets people fully utilize their money however they prefer. It's control, freedom, transparency and verifiability all combined into a single financial offering. 

In 2021 a shift began, though. 

Transaction costs of Ethereum mainnet transactions had become prohibitive. It was very expensive to do even the most basic transactions. Optimizing gas consumption for smart contracts was critical. Without efficient models in place, protocols became effectively unusable.

As Layer 2s (L2s), transactions that post transaction records back to Ethereum, began spinning up the existing users and ecosystem found itself in a place where monetary and operational security was abstracted into smaller selective pieces. But, users could finally transact for fractions of a cent without making compromises on the benefits they gained. 

With the continued focus on driving user-facing costs lower the market eventually reached a point of hyper specialization where general L2s became app chains that aim to do one thing very well. Avoiding the value of network effects, protocols began optimizing for the lowest possible costs while introducing new central authority risks, walled gardens, and liquidity fragmentation that negatively impacted everyone and every protocol, including the app chain itself.

At the same time in another piece of the industry, we saw account abstraction take hold. Account abstraction in the form of EIP-4337 had two major goals:

- Enable new signature schemes that weren't reliant on existing private key mechanisms.
- Solve the cold-start problem that forced users to have money to pay for gas before running their first transaction.

Many developers and VC firms believed that the biggest user hurdle was how messages are signed and that the need for gas was a significant limiter of adoption. At the same time, we saw millions of dollars pour into passkey solutions that do simplify the user experience by introducing authentication methods native to the device the user is on like FaceId.

Yet, even with the continued growth and adoption of account abstraction, the core user experience did not and will not nominally change outside of being able to log in with your Google account or Device Passkey.

## Money as Cash

Still, with all the effort, the user experience largely remained the same and even degraded in several places. You are still required to do everything manually. You still have to choose favorite protocols. You still can't achieve the basic practices of money management like a savings account that generates consistent yield without risk.

In all regards, every single user of crypto has been left to use their magic internet money like it is cash:

- You must transact in person by clicking buttons one by one.
- You must pay current market rates instead of being able to unlock the capital efficiency of futures.
- You must constantly be aware and knowledgeable enough to manage your own finances because financial advisors don’t really exist for this sector.

The most simple things that we have become used to like rent auto pay, automatic credit card payments to cover debts, mortgages that draw from our savings fund on a set basis are not options today. Nothing of this sort exists for crypto at scale and it can’t in the current model due the explicit need for transactions that are signed by private keys or the use of protocols designed for explicit legacy transactions.

Even more drastically, you do not even have the capacity to operate in a market that never closes. Even if you work in crypto there is a zero percent chance that you spend multiple hours a day onchain or even inside the applications of crypto protocols.

![You are offline a majority of the day](https://cdn.onplug.io/posts/why-we-built-plug/never-online.png)

You are at an inherent disadvantage. Everyone is. The broader ecosystem is being held back at the most fundamental layer by being forced to operate as if our crypto is cash rather than magic internet money as we know it to be.

In the end, so many non-crypto individuals liken the market to a degenerate equities market because in practice, it really is little more than that for most. The foundation for normal users to utilize their internet money like it’s actually digital doesn’t really exist.

## The “There’s Nothing to Do” Paradox

This issue is rooted deeper than priorities or user interest though. It’s not uncommon to hear participants of the current market remark that people do not care about decentralization; that all people want to do is gamble. For some, they aren’t far from the truth.

In reality, gambling is the product for *many*. But, what many often fail to realize is that carrying that belief is a statement of defeat. A perspective only formed through disgust and biased perspective without consideration of what the alternative truly looks like.

Those holding this perspective aren’t wrong, because well, there’s not much a normal user can do to get exposure to the benefits of crypto today. Unless you’re willing to become a psuedo-economist, the learning curve of how to use your money is much steeper than the difficulty ramp of buying crypto and holding it in spot. This is why only 1% of all crypto users use any semblance of DeFi. It’s unapproachable, confusing, and in general much riskier than other alternatives. Especially to people who are not willing to live and breathe the contents of the industry.

You have people trying, the basis is improving, but the experience pattern is still exceptionally subpar. So, the general user strapped with typical equity-market knowledge buys a few tokens, a few memecoins and forgets about it as they sit on their spot position while being completely blind to the real value the industry has to offer them; not really to their own fault.

Even for those that do know, the case is still much the same. When you summarize the general DeFi ecosystem you quickly realize that the majority of primitives today are focused on two things:

1. Asset acquisition.
2. Asset utilization.

With so little diversification your options for capital management are extremely limited. 

In most situations, users are really just choosing between a brand and the attached incentives that exist outside the base protocol. If the limitation stopped there it could be easily addressed, though. 

The deeper reality is that there simply isn’t much to do when everything requires you perform every action manually. Users can't really be glued to their devices at all time. Even if they choose to be, there isn't enough in crypto that provides entertainment to be online 24/7.

For many, there exists no interest in doing research about all the options before deciding where they should use their capital. Even when users finally understand a protocol they have no way of comparing it to the best rates or determine what gives them the best outcomes without having vetted every option available.

As a new market entrant your pool of options is small. Knowledge isn’t implicit, but ignorance is. It takes years to understand the new models in place. Without a close network of people that are deeply integrated it can be weeks until you even discover a protocol that gives you the functionality you are looking for.

Some chalk this up to discovery quality being poor, but really it’s that delivery is poor. Even with a vastly improved discovery process users will not have a vastly improved experience. 

A user should not need to know these things or do this work to get the benefit of crypto. Until they can get the benefits without such an extreme level of required knowledge, the market will feel empty and the general consumer of the world will stay far away. Until it as simple as depositing into a bank account and immediately earning yield, there is no hope for real mass adoption.

## Billions in Inefficiencies 

Without people transacting though, there is a constant lack of liquidity. Coordination of people is difficult. Coordination of liquidity is abysmal. There’s forever several yield protocols offering exceptionally high yield rates as they vie to become a king of the market. Forced to overpay, incentives flow in a way that results in limited growth and parasitic tendencies simply because a certain mechanism has not been capable of securing enough liquidity to function.

Perpetually compared to traditional rates of a bank account, users must make the constant decision if the newly introduced risk by crypto is worth the additional yield.

Today, fragmentation of chains has exacerbated this risk and knowlege issue. Users have more money onchain but that money is less concentrated than ever before. It’s distracted in all the worst ways:

- It’s spread across several different chains, many of them being fundamentally incompatible with one another.
- It’s siloed into countless wallets and continues to grow in disparity as embedded wallets continue to be pitched as a major value prop. because now users can sign up with their email.
- It’s delivered through wallet apps that show a single token across different chains as unique assets because the team can’t figure out how to unify the canonical reference with the social ones.

In every way, using your money onchain today is significantly worse than it was years ago. As an industry a lot of money and labor has been spent, but what benefit did it actually give users that are here today? Effectively nothing.

Because of this, protocols for the most part, operate in a worse ecosystem than ever before. The patterns needed to enable effective operation have disappeared. It is not that the market became competitive. It is not that the protocol isn’t appealing. The fundamental thesis and promise of blockchains and the value of network effects, simply put, was broken. Users aren’t the only ones that suffer, protocols feels that effect even more and this flywheel is accelerated by every investment into a hot new L2 that’s chasing the opportunity to allocate 40% of its token to investors.

It is the money ouroboros of the industry. So, while it feels bad today, it is only going to get much worse if a solution does not become available very soon.

## Chain Abstraction

Finally though, there’s at least real conversation about this problem. Primarily in the form of *chain abstraction* which is a commonly held belief that the path to correction here is one led by the idea that balances across all chains should be utilized as one. For a simple example here:

![Chain abstraction money flow](https://cdn.onplug.io/posts/why-we-built-plug/chain-abstractions.png)

- If you have USDC on Base, but want it on Arbitrum, you should be able to use that money with ease.

Unfortunately though, this belief is good in nature but exceptionally weak in reasoning tolerance while being exceptionally idealistic. Rather than fixing the fundamental problem, chain abstractions is permission granting to exacerbate the problem and leans into the hideous nature of a system where fragmentation is a systemic issue that’s never properly addressed.

While it seems to track logically, the idea quickly falls apart as you begin to dig into what this direction really means and what it enables. We’ve covered a basic example of the hopeful outputs, but we must consider what benefit, we, the users of the industry, get out of it. In the simplest answer, you get little tangible benefit:

- Your experience is still worse than it was years ago.
- Your settlement and transaction times are longer and more error-prone.
- Your cost of interactions grows significantly now that complexity of even the most simple transactions has been multiplied by many factors.
- The risk profile grows substantially as you introduce more middle men and non-atomic settlement into the standard execution path.
- Your ability to utilize the efforts of the last years effectively vanishes as things are siloed into their own ecosystem.

In nearly every single situation, a philosophy of *one balance* is delivering users a trash experience that has been disguised as a cherry pie with a dollop of whipped cream on top. It is a step backwards covered in a mirage of technical jargon and improvement. It's an idea simple to sell to the non-technical. But, it is exceptionally hard to build around, insanely detached from real-world benefit, and is stuck at square one where you can count those making real progress and improvements on one hand.

The idea that chain abstraction is a solution is especially confusing when acknowledging that leading wallet applications have been stagnant for years after having done little more than copy-pasting the designs of one another with little change or evolution... And users don't easily change the wallet they daily-drive.

Yet, it is a righteous desire. I don't discount them or blame them for trying. There's a group of people working to improve the space with a temporary solution while the long-term one is established. Chain abstraction simply isn't the most direct or realistic path to an improved ecosystem or user experience.

## Directionally Correct

So, if we understand the problem to result in a bad user experience and ineffective liquidity management what can we do to improve that? Really, it's simple. It's just highly under-funded and under-developed.

The obvious answer here is enable *atomic transaction automation*.

In the last few years there have been several attempts to do this. You do have platforms like [Gelato](https://www.gelato.network/), but it was made for the highly technical and failed to enable the general end-user. You still have to write code to get any level of functionality while dealing with a much worse user experience. Even more recently they have pivoted and directed their focus away from improving this product. Antithetically too, you are trusting Gelato with the outputs of automation and thus inputs of transactions. 

So, not only have users not been empowered with the functionality that brings real improvement to the industry, the only real option also comes with a big set of drawbacks that have made the rate of adoption extremely low. More importantly, the general consumer and blockchain user still effectively has no option to choose from.

## Automation Is Not Solved

In the meantime though, a few protocols have risen that claim to empower users with the capabilities of automation. Generally, they are using the word incorrectly and are making a claim that is fundamentally false. Instead, these protocols are really offering increased yield through managed vaults that have a single vault like:

1. Users deposit into a vault.
2. The operator of the vault rebalances the position.
3. Yield is increased due to centralized management.

The user has not been empowered to automate anything. The user deposits into a vault that they have no real control or influence over. Users of yielding-vaults have been empowered with an increase in yield, not automation.

Still today users are left without any real option to create strategies or even to adopt strategies that already exist. Even the most technical developers such as Foundry framework developers struggle to provide this functionality to themselves after having invested hundreds of hours into building a system of their own. Of course, there are MEV bot frameworks that you can adopt, but you are left to do everything yourself. 

There is not a single market-accessible automation solution that supports general execution and highly customized strategies without requiring the user to be exceptionally sophisticated.

## Our Future

We are here to solve this with Plug. 

Plug is the single destination for all your crypto activities in one place. We're not just another wallet or interface - we're building a comprehensive platform that fundamentally changes how you interact with blockchain:

- **Multi-account portfolio management**: Unified view and control of all your assets across different wallets and chains.

- **Complete ecosystem composability**: Interact with any protocol through a single, intuitive interface.

- **Automated strategies with granular control**: Create, customize, and deploy sophisticated transaction strategies without writing code.

- **Reactive runtime transactions with coils**: Dynamic data-driven transactions that adapt to market conditions in real-time.

- **Set-and-forget automation**: Systems that optimize your positions 24/7 without requiring constant monitoring.

What all of this enables is a set of experiences and features that cannot be found anywhere else in the crypto ecosystem. As we get closer to our public launch, we'll share more details on each of these capabilities and how they work together to create a seamless experience.

It should be clear that we are here to redefine what the typical user experience looks like and deliver automated-enabled features that help you outperform. It's not another piece of infrastructure designed to only be used by 20 companies. 

Plug has been a venture of passion built by rethinking every small detail of how you interact with blockchains today. It's been crafted with the hindsight of past mistakes and the foresight of a clear future where humans no longer need to manually execute every blockchain transaction. We've prioritized a user-first mindset rather than a tech-first approach, always keeping your needs and experience at the center of our design philosophy.

The journey to redefining crypto interactions starts here. Make sure to [follow along on Twitter](https://twitter.com/try_plug) so that you are the first to know as we reach the next steps.


Crypto has the potential to change the way people use money for decades to come. It feels like a dream where you have real ownership of your money. Where you arent resorting to a...

Why We Built Plug.



Every morning, I wake up and start working with a symphony of AI assistants. Claude helps architect our systems, Cursor generates our code, ChatGPT brainstorms solutions, Perplexity researches edge cases, the list goes on. My reality is highly AI-augmented.

So when someone sends me yet another crypto agent chat interface, I get why they're excited. The promise is intoxicating...

"What if you could just tell an AI to make you money?"

Just tell an AI what you want, and it handles all the complexity of crypto for you. No more juggling DEX interfaces, tracking yield farms, or monitoring positions across chains. Just vibes and gains.

But I'm frustrated because no one has shown me an agent that can do something other than swap or bridge. No one has shown me a chat interface for transaction definition that actually works. Right now, we're swimming in demos and pitch decks while hard problems remain unsolved.

Although it's early, there's an exciting future for these proof of concept ideas. Many societal markers point towards a future with systems that transact on behalf of humans using crypto: users believe in this future, investors believe in this future enough to fund it, builders are attempting to create this future, etc.

Last week we budgeted a few hours to explore what a chat interface for Plug might look like. It is scrappy, but it's better than every single market-available "agent" that exists today.

Morgan can read your wallet contents, build and discover Plugs to use, suggest actions based on your goals, run and schedule your Plugs, re-organize the app with a live context-based layout, etc. It only took a ~300 lines of code to significantly improve upon the experience that is readily available today.

![An example of Plug's chat interface in action](https://cdn.onplug.io/posts/chat-interfaces/1-morgan.png)

If you want to try Morgan out someday, sign up for the [Plug waitlist](https://onplug.io).

After testing other crypto AI agents and exploring the chat interface in our product, I've come to a realization: we're asking the wrong questions about what AI should do in crypto.

## Current State of Crypto AI Agents

The gap between promise and reality becomes clear when we examine actual implementations. Let's look at some leading attempts at crypto AI agents to understand what their successes and limitations reveal about our current approach to AI in crypto.

### Nani.ooo

Nani was one of the first intent agents that I came across midway through 2024 and became the first “agent” project I tried out. When I first tried nani.ooo, it was a Windows Desktop-esque experience with different apps I could click into, one of which was the chat interface. After depositing ETH, I was able to use the chat interface to swap to NEETH (their own token).

When I try to use the interface today, the experience is more similar to ChatGPT and it does seem to try to write an intent and post it to the Nani Deployer contract.

![Nani.ooo interface writing an intent using an LLM chat interface](https://cdn.onplug.io/posts/chat-interfaces/2-nani.png)

When I click EXECUTE ON SMART WALLET, I get error messages that don’t allow me to move forward. I see that there are some other commands written to the contract on Basescan.

![Basescan interface showing transactions to the Nani Deployer contract](https://cdn.onplug.io/posts/chat-interfaces/3-basescan.png)

My experience ended here. My understanding is that in it's current state, Nani is more of a set of developer tools than a consumer product.

### Griffain

After trading the $GRIFFAIN AI memecoin, I finally was able to try out the platform. I had to spend 2 SOL to get access and then ended up in an interface with a bunch of different “agents” available to me.

![Griffain agent marketplace](https://cdn.onplug.io/posts/chat-interfaces/4-griffain.png)

I chose to interact with the Sniper Bot and did not have the best experience. I was expecting to have a back and forth with the agent about what we’d be doing together but instead it felt like I kicked off an open script to buy memecoins based on parameters loosely defined in my sentence: Only snipe if the description mentions AI.

![Griffain sniper bot](https://cdn.onplug.io/posts/chat-interfaces/5-griffain.png)

When we think about generalized intents, should the AI help you devise the intent or should the AI write the intent for you? At which point do you give over the wheel and say send it?

## The Chat Interface Oversimplification

Using a chat interface to write financial transaction instructions isn't just inefficient - it's technological regression. We've moved from command line interfaces to graphical UIs because they're more efficient, only to circle back to essentially typing commands in natural language? It's like replacing your banking app with a local bank branch.

The promise of AI isn't in making simple tasks more complicated - it's in making complex tasks more approachable. Yet current crypto chat interfaces often add unnecessary steps to straightforward operations while failing to meaningfully handle complex ones.

## The Intent Behind AI Agent Usage

My user experience with these products has led me to wonder what users truly want out of chat interfaces and AI agent interactions?
Using LLMs in our worfklows adds value because we can…

- Offload decision making and responsibility
- Abstract complexity
- Be met where we are informationally
- Interact with a personality that guides and entertains us
  Interacting with software through an anthropomorphized chat interface isn’t a wholly new concept but it’s one that has been highly re-popularized since the release of ChatGPT in late 2022.

  Early story based video games could be interacted with through a chat interface that allowed players to type commands to move through the story.

  While software products with buttons communicate where the boundaries are, chat interfaces allow you to think anything is possible… even if it isn’t. The blackbox aspects of LLM chatbots lead to a sense of wonder – one of the few pieces of consumer technology that still feels magical to us today.
  But as Chance mentions in [The Glass Box](https://chance.utc24.io/paper/glass-box/):

> _These models optimize for scale, minimizing the cognitive load on users. The complexity is hidden to provide an interface that "just works." But here lies the flaw: the more hidden the system, the more prone it becomes to misuse, misunderstanding, and distrust. It introduces fragility where transparency could build resilience._

By trading an aspect of our autonomy for convenience and wonder when offloading decision making to opaque LLMs, we introduce room for influence and error.

## Real Utility in AI Crypto Agents

In many cases, trading off nuance control to an LLM for speed in output is net positive. Earlier this month, [Andrej Karpathy](https://x.com/karpathy/status/1886192184808149383) beautifully articulated a feeling that a lot of people have been feeling recently – a type of working flow state wherein you code via prompts.
![Andrej Karpathy vibe coding tweet](https://cdn.onplug.io/posts/chat-interfaces/8-vibecoding.png)

> _There's a new kind of coding I call "vibe coding", where you fully give in to the vibes, embrace exponentials, and forget that the code even exists. It's possible because the LLMs (e.g. Cursor Composer w Sonnet) are getting too good. Also I just talk to Composer with SuperWhisper so I barely even touch the keyboard. I ask for the dumbest things like "decrease the padding on the sidebar by half" because I'm too lazy to find it. I "Accept All" always, I don't read the diffs anymore. When I get error messages I just copy paste them in with no comment, usually that fixes it. The code grows beyond my usual comprehension, I'd have to really read through it for a while. Sometimes the LLMs can't fix a bug so I just work around it or ask for random changes until it goes away. It's not too bad for throwaway weekend projects, but still quite amusing. I'm building a project or webapp, but it's not really coding \- I just see stuff, say stuff, run stuff, and copy paste stuff, and it mostly works._

When I use [Cursor](https://www.cursor.com/) and [Claude](https://claude.ai), I sometimes reach this flow state and push features faster than expected. At other times, I find myself in a deadend and have to dump active changes and restart at the most recent working commit.

Vibe coding works in software developments thanks to the ability to revert changes. It's a different story for onchain transactions.

Do you really want to vibe code your financial activities?

You could get away with vibe coding a single trading wallet – this is essentially what I did with Griffain. I said, “Hey I’m feeling frisky today let’s buy some memecoins that fit my parameters” and lil buddy gave me exactly what I wanted.

![Griffain Sniper Bot](https://cdn.onplug.io/posts/chat-interfaces/9-griffain.png)

The Griffain Sniper Bot I used started buying things quickly and I didn’t have time to respond before it chewed through my deposits; a risk of automation (especially in the context of pseudo-gambling memecoins).

My experience using AI in development shows how AI can be a powerful thought partner when building complex systems. What if we applied this same collaborative framework to crypto? Instead of asking AI to autonomously manage our assets, what if we used it to help us make better decisions about them?

A different model emerges - one of purposeful collaboration rather than autonomous execution. This suggests a more nuanced approach to AI agents in crypto.

## Building Infrastructure for Agents

Right now, most crypto AI interfaces can swap and bridge because that's all their underlying infrastructure allows. The multi-function agentic future we envision requires more work to achieve.

This is precisely why we're building Plug the way we are. We're not starting with a chat interface or a single omniscient agent – we're building the foundational infrastructure that enables meaningful agent collaboration. A robust solver that can compose complex transactions across protocols. A growing library of protocol integrations. A framework for writing and executing generalized intents.

When we integrate a protocol into Plug, we're expanding the universe of what's possible for every agent in the ecosystem. Each integration creates new possibilities for composition and automation. We're starting from first principles, focusing on the fundamentals that will empower both humans and agents to do more with crypto.


Every morning, I wake up and start working with a symphony of AI assistants. Claude helps architect our systems, Cursor generates our code, ChatGPT brainstorms solutions, Perplexit...

Chat Interfaces and Crypto Agents.



We are Terminally Online Inc. and you may know us individually as [danner](https://twitter.com/drakedanner) or [chance](https://twitter.com/nftchance). We've spent the past 5 years plugged into the EVM landscape and we're here to plug you in too.

## The Reality Check

If you're reading this, you probably have a setup that looks familiar: Multiple monitors, endless Discord and Telegram notifications, and more browser windows than your RAM signed up for. The state of DeFi feels like trying to play 4D chess while juggling. You've got yield farms here, LP positions there, and god forbid you try to time a transaction across multiple protocols without missing the perfect entry.

We've been there. We are there. And we're building the solution we've always wanted. Initially, when we set out to build Plug, we considered building a product that allowed users to log off and spend more time touching grass. As we continued to build, we realized - that's not who we are; that's not who you are.

Let's be real - I've got 47 browser tabs open right now. This isn't just a problem to solve - it's who we are. The question isn't how to log off, it's how to become even more online. We live in the ether, we spend our days streaming our homes to those we build with. We named our company Terminally Online for a reason. We don't log off and we are here to build for others like us.

## Our Journey Here

I've spent my entire life seeking the cutting edge of functional technology and my entire career in early stage fintech and crypto startups. I've had the opportunity to build teams and hire across every department imaginable. I've gotten to perform a laundry list of operational and technical roles and the teams I've worked with have built systems that have processed $5b+ across compliant Web2 and Web3 rails. I've gotten to work with Chance over the years as he's enabled nearly a million gas optimized transactions and developed delightful software experiences.
We're excited to begin releasing product that we fully own and direct.

## Meet Plug

We're not here to tell you to touch grass. We're here to build the command center for the terminally online. Your protocols, your strategies, your automations - all running exactly how you want them, when you want them. No more tab juggling required.
For the first time ever, you can:

- Schedule constraints-driven transactions (because sometimes you need to sleep)
- Access all major protocol functionality without bouncing between apps
- Create and share strategies that actually make you money
- Set up "if this, then that" executions that squeeze maximum value from every move
  One interface to access Ethereum, one interface to combine protocols, one interface to schedule transactions, and one interface to manage your onchain experience.

## What's Coming

We're starting with Season 0 - our founding users phase. This initial release will be referral-gated, with priority access for everyone on the Plug waitlist. Being a founding user means more than just early access; it comes with built-in advantages that persist:

Your transactions will be evaluated more frequently, leading to better execution. We'll subsidize your gas costs on L2s, and you'll get early access to new features as we roll them out.

We're taking a seasonal approach to give us flexibility - each season lasting between one to several months. This structure lets us integrate new protocols, test incentive alignment mechanisms, and evolve the product ecosystem based on what we learn together.

When we transition to Season 1, our founding users keep their enhanced capabilities. We're building Plug for the long term, and we want our earliest users to remain at the forefront of its evolution.

## The Future

This isn't just another DeFi tool. We're building the infrastructure for the next generation of onchain activity. A platform where users can compose, automate, and execute complex strategies without compromising on control or capability. This is about unlocking the true potential of being terminally online.

Ready to plug in? Join the waitlist at [onplug.io](https://www.onplug.io).


We are Terminally Online Inc. and you may know us individually as danner or chance. Weve spent the past 5 years plugged into the EVM landscape and were here to plug you in too....

The best developer and user experience in crypto.

An adaptive crypto backend

An app to get the most out of crypto

An experience obsessed team

The best developer and user experience in crypto.

An adaptive crypto backend

An app to get the most out of crypto

An experience obsessed team